베를린 훔볼트 대학 Jonathan Beere 교수 초청 강연: 플라톤의 <국가>
Jonathan Beere 교수가 1월 20일과 22일에 서울대와 이화여대에서 플라톤의 <국가>와 관련한 강의를 합니다. 서울대 강연의 제목은 "What is Political Justice in Plato's Republic"이고, 이화여대 강연의 제목은 "Thrasymachus behind the Veil of Ignorance: Plato and Rawls on Ideal Theory and the Problem of Justice"입니다. 관심 있는 분의 많은 참석을 부탁드립니다.
Jonathan Beere 교수는 프린스턴 대학에서 박사학위를 받았으며, 시카고 대학 교수를 거쳐 현재는 베를린 훔볼트 대학교의 교수로 재직중입니다. Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle's Metaphysics Theta (2009)를 Oxford University Press에서 출간한 바 있으며, 주요 논문으로 "The Best City in Plato's Republic: Is It Possible?" (Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2023), "Faking Wisdom: The Expertise of Sophistic in Plato's Sophist" (Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 2019), "Philosophy, Virtue and Immortality in Plato's Phaedo" (Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 2011), "Potentiality and the Matter of Composite Substance" (Phronesis, 2006) 등이 있습니다.
- 서울대 강연
- 일 시: 2025. 1. 20 (월) 오후 4:00-6:00
- 장 소: 서울대학교 인문대학 7동309호
- 강연자: Jonathan Beere (베를린 훔볼트 대학교)
- 제 목: What is political justice in Plato's Republic?
- 내용: In Book IV of the Republic, Socrates gives an account of the justice of a city. According to this account, for a city to be just is for each part of the city to do the work for which its nature is best suited. This seems like a very bad account of what it is for a city to be just. For it seems that a city might be unjust, even if each part of it does the work for which its nature is best suited. (1) It would seem that the citizens in such a city might perpetrate all sorts of injustice against one another. (2) It would seem that many goods might be unjustly distributed in such a city. (3) Even worse, the account suggests a thoroughgoing exploitation of all citizens, since each citizen's good seems to be subordinated to the good of the city; this would surely be unjust. I propose an interpretation of the account of political justice on which these problems are solved. The crux of my proposal concerns the specification of the jobs to be done: what jobs there are, and what each job is, depends on what the other jobs are and also on how all of the jobs fit together into a whole system (politeia). The whole system serves, as I argue, the happiness of the citizens.For this reason, the jobs are specified with reference to the needs and happiness of the citizensandwith reference to each citizen's ability to make themselves and their fellow citizens happy. I explain how this interpretation of Plato's account resolves the three problems I identified. My interpretation also entails that the so-called City of Pigs is just. I conclude that, on Plato's account, a just city is one in which all competition over goods -- even over goods like money, food and honor -- has been resolved: even as each citizen pursues their own happiness, each citizentherebycontributes to the happiness of everyone else -- and to the good of the system (politeia) that secures the happiness of all.
- 이화여대 강연
- 일시: 2025.1.22. (수) 오후 4:00-6:00
- 장소 이화여대 학관 509호
- 제목: Thrasymachus behind the Veil of Ignorance: Plato and Rawls on Ideal Theory and the Problem of Justice
- 내용: I imagine Thrasymachus -- a character from Plato's Republic -- participating in the deliberation behind the "veil of ignorance" described by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice. The veil of ignorance is part of Rawls' ideal theory of justice. Ideal theory, in Rawls' sense, does not address the causes of injustice; it postpones to a second step the question of how to address injustice. Rawls proposed that we imagine citizens who are behind a veil of ignorance, i.e., who do not know about their wealth, status, and position in society. Behind the veil of ignorance, they deliberate about how the primary goods are to be distributed among themselves. I think that by imagining Thrasymachus participating in this debate, we can see that Rawls' conception of ideal theory rests on the assumption that the primary goods are independent of the causes of injustice, and we also see that this is highly questionable. At the same time, we see something new in Plato: he, too, is presenting a form of ideal theory, but a form that, unlike Rawls's, requires the ideal political structure to address the causes of injustice because the primary goods are not independent of the causes of injustice.
